Pierre’s logs

levers for change + all things sustainable 
Filed under

economy

 

'The real dividend, he says, is diversity' #SlowMoney #WoodyTasch #WSJ

The real dividend, he says, is diversity: In an era of industrial agriculture, where millions of acres are planted with the same variety of corn and millions of pigs are bred to be genetically similar, small local farms are the ultimate hedge fund. They preserve heirloom seeds and quirky breeds; strengthen the soil with organic nutrients; create local markets that connect producer directly to consumer.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   economy   slowmoney   sustainability   sustainable   Woody Tasch  

Comments [0]

FT.com / Comment / Opinion - Obama’s chance to lead the green recovery

The economic crisis will leave the US and other economies greatly weakened and it will be imperative to increase efficiency. One area in which there is ample room for improvement is in the energy efficiency of businesses, consumers and the government.

According to a recent paper by the Peterson Institute, spending $10bn (€7.9bn, £7.1bn) to insulate US homes and federal buildings could create and sustain up to 100,000 jobs between 2009 and 2011, while saving the economy from $1.4bn to $3.1bn a year between 2012 and 2020.

This type of investment and those in green technology and infrastructure would not only provide a short-term stimulus but also improve the US competitive position. As the world moves to a low-carbon economy, there will be a competitive advantage for those who embrace these technologies.

via ft.com

By Joseph Stiglitz and Nicholas Stern
Published: March 2 2009 19:16 | Last updated: March 2 2009 19:16

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   crisis   economy   investment   joseph stiglitz   low-carbon   nicholas stern   obama   technology   united states  

Comments [0]

Worldchanging: Bright Green: "Developing Nations" Creative Commons License

The Developing Nations license allows, for the first time, any copyright holder in the world to participate first-hand in reforming global information policy. The fact is that most of the world's population is simply priced out of developed nations' publishing output. To authors, that means an untapped readership. To economists, it means "deadweight loss." To human rights advocates and educators, it is a tragedy. The Developing Nations license is designed to address all three concerns.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   change   copyrights   developing nations   development   economy   human rights   world  

Comments [0]

Designing for a Sustainable World - via World Usability Day

Human-centered design directly supports the first two pillars of sustainability:

  • Economic - matching a design to user's needs and abilities enhance its utilization, quality, and efficiency, thus providing cost effective solutions and reducing the likelihood that systems products and services will be rejected by their users;
  • Social - taking a human-centered approach results in systems, products and services which are better for the health and wellbeing of their users, including users with disabilities;

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   design   economy   human centered   social change   sustainability   sustainable  

Comments [0]

The Future of Money


Chinese symbol for friendship

  • The global money system no longer works in our best interests; we need a serious overhaul of money - and of our attitude towards it.  Based on the four mega-trends of monetary instability, the ageing global population, the information revolution, and climate change, Bernard Lietaer looks at different scenarios of what the world might be like in 2020.
    1. The Corporate Millennium: governments are disbanded, central banks become irrelevant, and the world is run with Big Brother control by huge corporations with their own currencies.
    2. Caring Communities: after a monetary crash, people retreat into small, self-sustaining communities, like tribes.
    3. Hell on Earth: in which the breakdown of life as we know it is followed by a highly individualistic free-for-all, resulting in an ever more obscene gulf between rich and poor.
    4. Sustainable Abundance: envisages a world where we take better care of the environment, re-engage the poor and the unemployed in mainstream society and give back time and fufilment to the over-worked, while providing the elderly with a high level of personal care.
     A society of Sustainable Abundance is achievable - but only if we are willing to re-think our money system and use money innovations that have already proven effective somewhere in the world today.

    http://www.lietaer.com/books/futureofmoney.html
  • If the thought of eliminating money still troubles you, consider this: If a group of people with gold, diamonds and money were stranded on an island that had no resources such as food, clean air and water, their wealth would be irrelevant to their survival. It is only when resources are scarce that money can be used to control their distribution. One could not, for example, sell the air we breathe or water abundantly flowing down from a mountain stream. Although air and water are valuable, in abundance they cannot be sold.
    Money is only important in a society when certain resources for survival must be rationed and the people accept money as an exchange medium for the scarce resources. Money is a social convention, an agreement if you will. It is neither a natural resource nor does it represent one. It is not necessary for survival unless we have been conditioned to accept it as such.

    http://www.thevenusproject.com/anewResource.php
  • Advantages of open money

    • Decentralized: no need for a centralized issuer like a bank, which means no threats from a centralized power.
    • Free: no interest is practiced because there is no issuer that makes a business of it. The only cost is the one of the infrastructure, which is a flat marginal cost, not an exponential one like in the interest.
    • Peer-to-peer: the total quantity of money in the community is determined in realtime by peer-to-peer exchange. There is no centralized authority that determines how much, where and when the quantity of money should be allocated. These can be seen as distributed fractal feedback loops to regulate the system and make it resilient.
    • Controlled by the people: the rules of circulation, credit limits, taxes, decision making processes, etc, are controlled by the community itself. These settings can be configured via software.
    • Sufficient: because based on mutual credit?, i.e. there's never a lack of money since it is created upon the needs/wants streaming.
    • Holoptical: transparent between users, and users have access to the meta level of the system to understand and regulate its whole equilibrium.
    • Adapted to all needs and all communities: whether communities are based on a local territory or a virtual one, each community exists because it has a circulating offer/demand within it. It can be time exchange, objects, services, knowledge... in a competitive or collaborative economy. Mainstream currencies only serve competitive markets, open money serves whatever market since it is sufficient and can be applied in any context.
    • Connected to any "real" or "virtual" value: any community currency can be based on a "real" value (time, gold, kilowatt, kilo of potatoes, oil, distance...) or a "virtual" value (i.e. no relation to anything in the real world, it is just a unit of exchange used by the community)

    http://www.thetransitioner.org/wen/tiki-index.php?page=Open+Money

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   economy   future   future of money   lietaer   money   sustainability   transitioner  

Comments [0]